Chad Montrie of the History Department at UMass Lowell began the series of Fall Seminars on Wednesday, September 19, 2007 at the Madeline English School in Everett. Professor Montrie expounded
on the development of the American Revolution as a political and philosophical dispute over representation and consent. The question of whether the Colonists’ justification for independence was grounded in John Locke’s views on natural rights and tyranny was explained. Locke believed that rights are things people are born with, therefore no one can take them away, but they may be denied you. The colonists needed to separate from Great Britain because they believed they were dealing with tyranny, that Britain was denying them their rights; thus the
Declaration of Independence was created. Teachers were asked to consider the derivation of Jefferson's ideas of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness--ideas which were not unique to the Declaration of Independence.
From Colonies to StatesFollowing declarations of independence and rights, colonies wrote state constitutions which retained the basic forms of colonial government.

These state constitutions raised the question of who would rule; did the common people have the capacity to govern themselves? The constitutions of Pennsylvania and Massachusetts were viewed as examples of how the philosophy of the authors of each influenced the creation of dissimilar documents. Pennsylvania's constitution written in 1776 by a provincial assembly of farmers and artisans illustrated a radical democracy influenced by Thomas Paine. The constitution of Massachusetts written in 1780 by John Adams included a more complex legislative power with a strong executive branch and bicameral legislation.
The Genesis of the ConstitutionThe first constitution of the United States, the
Articles of Confederation, was ratified in 1781. After the Revolution some leaders felt that this document were not strong enough for the new country. It left too much sovereignty to the states and was powerless as a national government.

The lack of unity among the states was causing problems in international relations, defense and the economic well-being of the states. A Constitutional Convention was convened in May 1787 in Philadelphia. At issue were how much power to allow the central government, how many representatives in Congress from each state and how these representatives should be elected. The
Constitution was ratified by 1789. Many states, not satisfied with the Constitution as drafted, expressed a desire for a "bill of rights" in order to prevent abuse of powers. The
Bill of Rights based on George Mason's
Virginia Declaration of Rights was ratified in 1791.
Revolution and Counter-RevolutionTeachers then participated in a lively group exercise in which they separated into two groups to either defend the Declaration of Independence as a founding document or make the same case for the Constitution. Teachers examined the documents' origins, purpose and spirit, main principles, and underlying ideas and its impact. John Fergus, speaking in defense of the Declaration of Independence, stated that "The spirit of the document is human equality." Diane Dideo defended the Constitution as a founding document by declaring " The Declaration of Independence no longer provides America with what is needed." It seems that consensus was that although the constitution was necessary to do the "business" of government, the spirit of the declaration will always be a part of America.
Labels: Chad Montrie, Declaration of Independence, U.S. Constitution